Wednesday, February 20, 2013

Pistorius

So his alibi is that he THOUGHT his girlfriend was still in bed and that he THOUGHT that the person he shot through a locked door was actually an intruder who must have climbed a ladder to get into his upper story apartment .

She must have been sound asleep on the toilet in that case, because he freely admits that he tried kicking the door down with his artificial legs first AND then used a baseball bat on the door several times to try getting into the room.

Not ONCE did he think it was his girlfriend who he thought was still SLEEPING in their bed after all of this noise and commotion.

Is he deaf? Did he not HEAR her crying out, "it's me!" any time during the process.

He said he was scared for his life that an intruder was in his LOCKED bathroom, so, after failing to get into the bathroom, he simply fired a gun through the locked door FOUR times?

Let's see, the "intruder" was safely in a locked room AWAY from them. He didn't have time to go to his girlfriend (who was in bed a short distance away) and tell her to get up and leave quickly, but he had time to put on (and TAKE OFF his artificial legs) and find a baseball bat and use it on the door.

He then had even MORE time to go get a gun...

All the time "fearing for his life" but never simply fleeing with his girlfriend?

I don't usually judge cases until I hear all the evidence. I think I just heard all of his evidence. He's either the absolute deaf and dumbest boyfriend of all-time or he is a cold-blooded killer.

I've made up my mind. I don't think the jury will take long either.

Actually, I just gave you the prosecution's story.

His version:

He grabbed his gun and yelled to his girlfriend to call the police. He shot through the door FIRST. THEN, realizing his girlfriend was not in bed like he thought, frantically broke down the door to find his girlfriend dying.

Now there's doubt.

The jury will have to decide which story makes the most sense.

3 comments:

  1. What do they have? Just the judge?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Some sort of panel if I understood it corectly. Definitely not a jury. Only 3-4 countries actually have jury trials.

    ReplyDelete